[ Competition summary || British European subzonal 1A | Atlantic European subzonal 1B | South European subzonal 1C | Central European subzonal 2A | Nordic European subzonal 2B | East European zonal 3 |
| Soviet zonal | Mediterranean zonal | US zonal | Canadian zonal | Central American zonal | South American zonal | West Asian zonal | South-East Asian zonal ||
|| Interzonal Havana | Interzonal Zheleznovodsk || Candidates Malmö || WCh match ]

<< [ Crosstable || Information ] >>

Crosstable

pos.	name	Elo	flag	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	pts	Berger	+	=	-
⇑ 1.	WIM Ferrer Lucas, Pepita	2050		●	½	1	1	0	½	½	1	4½	15.25	3	3	1
2.	WIM García Vicente, Nieves	2180		½	●	1	½	½	½	½	1	4½	14.75	2	5	0
3.	Cuevas Rodríguez, María Luisa	2070		0	0	●	1	1	½	1	1	4½	13.00	4	1	2
4.	García Padrón, María del Pino	2125		0	½	0	●	1	1	1	1	4½	12.25	4	1	2
5.	De los Santos, Isabel			1	½	0	0	●	½	1	½	3½	11.00	2	3	2
6.	Iacono, Rosaria	1880		½	½	½	0	½	●	½	½	3	10.25	0	6	1
7.	Deghenghi, Annamaria	1905		½	½	0	0	0	½	●	½	2	6.75	0	4	3
8.	Ferreira, Aida			0	0	0	0	½	½	½	●	1½	4.25	0	3	4

There was much chaos around classification rules. Tournament rules stated - breaking official FIDE rules - than Sonneborn-Berger was a tie-breaker instead
of a play-off. The players were somehow misorientated and did not actually know what would the rules be. As it happened, at the end of the last round, the main arbiter
sealed the Berger as the tie-breaker being unaware that the one to take interzonal spot is Ferrer, and not García Vicente as everyone thought!

Information